Engine Oil Filter Study

[ Disassembly and Measurements | SAE Tests | Mopar Conversion Table | Conclusions ]

Someone mailed this to me (accidentally deleted their message so I can not give proper creditr for this). Do not email me with questions since I did not author it. Sorry!

It was originally authored by Russ W. Knize, his web page is http://members.xoom.com/minimopar/oilfilterstudy.html

PRINTING ISSUES:

If you have trouble with colors when printing this or any other page, use the color override option on your web brewer. For more information, see the Printing On This Site page. I have been pondering switching the site to a printer-friendly color scheme, but that would be a HUGE project, at this point.

UPDATE:

Please read the new Warning section now.

A few people out there are helping me by sending filters. Many thanks go to them. I am happy to cut open and evaluate filters of the same type for brands that I have not tested, but I really don't want to try to cover all of the types for other vehicles. The scale of this project has already exceeded my original intentions, but I really want to finish it.

I have a special feature page for Mopar because that is why this page is here in the first place. The Audi/VW special feature is in progress because I cannot compare the German filters to the Ford 5.0L filter (they do not manufacture a true equivalent). The majority of those filters were sent by XXXXXX, at his expense. The VW/Audi/Volvo crowd has been helping me out a lot, so I am featuring their coveted filters here.

I encourage anyone out there to repeat this study for their own type of vehicle. Perhaps we can all network our studies together. This may be the beginning of a a major wake-up call for oil filter manufacturers. We're watching you!!!

Other changes are coming, including information on the European AC Delco filter.

NOTICE:

I have been getting flooded with email about this page and simply cannot answer everyone, so I apologize if your email has gone unanswered. I have been very busy lately and so updates to this site have been scarce. I have received many requests for other filter studies. Some of the requested filters are on their way and I will hopefully be able to add them to this page soon. Here is the list of filters I intend to add, assuming I can find them all (“?” means I don't know the part #, "o" means I now have this filter):

-- AC Delco PF2L

o Amsoil SDF-15 - acquired, ASF series has been discontinued

-- Bosch - no direct Ford 5.0L cross-reference (see VW feature)

-- Champ ?

-- Fram HP1 - acquired

o Hard Driver HD01 - acquired

-- Hastings LF115

-- K&N ?

-- Purolator HP1/L390001 - acquired

-- Mann - no direct Ford 5.0L cross-reference (see VW feature)

I have cut open all the filters I have acquired so far, but I have not torn them down completely because I need to take pictures. I won’t be taking pictures until I have acquired more of the filters listed above. I do not intend to look into any filters for other types of vehicles. I chose the Ford 5.0L filter because it can be used for several other engines and is quite large in size, which improves the relative surface area data between manufacturers.

I have had a couple of requests from people wondering what my qualifications are. Quite frankly, I am just a concerned automotive enthusiast that is tired of being toyed with by these manufacturers. In reality, I am an Electrical Engineer with no qualifications in the area of filtration analysis. However, I have eyes and some common sense, which has proven to be enough to accomplish what I set out to do.

Feel free to link to this page.

Happy filtering!

XXXXXXXXXXXX

Warning!

These pages are NOT to be taken as gospel. The primary motivation behind this study was to provide information about what oil filter brands are made by which manufacturers. The secondary motivation was to uncover some of the obvious internal construction issues of these manufacturers. This "study" is not a "test". The SAE J806 and J1858 tests were designed to test the filtration capability of these filters, but unfortunately they have several short comings. These include issues such as anti-drainback valve functionality (valve train noise, etc.), filter element containment capability (how long before it blocks and bypasses--related to surface area), and many testimonials that appear to point in the direction of certain manufacturers. It has been my hope to shed some light in the direction of these issues. While my infamous "two eyes and common sense" approach may not be the most scientific, it is the best I could do considering there was no personal return on the investment of time and money I put into it.

The primary shortcoming of this study is the small sampling size. I only tested the Ford 5.0L filter. It has come to my attention that some brand names use different manufacturers for different applications. Another shortcoming is the lack of testing of the filter element media itself. Unfortunately I have neither the time nor resources to do this.

I invite anyone with the means to take a larger sampling size and conduct a more complete study, which may include private SAE tests. I also invite anyone to repeat a study similar to this one on other model filters.

With all of that said, please make your own judgements. Use this study only as a source of some information that may give you a better idea about which filter brands to steer clear from. It should be obvious that some manufacturers are not being honest about their product. The next time you buy a filter for your car, buy two and hack one open to see what you have. My intent was to give you some information and alert you to some little-known issues, not to tell you what to think.

Description

One weekend I set out to every auto parts store in my area and bought every brand of oil filter I could find. I chose to get the filter for the early Ford 5.0L V8 engine. The reason is that this is a popular filter, it is large so that I can unveil any fake miniature internal components, and it fits on most 2.2L and 2.5L engines. Design-wise it is fully compatible with our oil systems and is an excellent replacement for the pathetic filter that was designed for our engines. I was able to find 20 different filters spanning several brand names. They are (in alphabetical order):

AC Delco Duraguard PF2

AC Delco Duraguard PF2L

AMSOIL SDF15

Car And Driver SF-1A

Champ

Deutsch D539

Deutsch D545

Fram Extra Guard PH8A

Fram Tough Guard TG8A

Fram Double Guard DG8A

Hard Driver HD01

Mobil 1 M1-301

Mopar 4105409

Mopar 5281090

Mopar 3549957

Mopar 53020311

Motorcraft FL-1A

NAPA Gold 1515

Penzoil PZ-1

PowerFlo SL30001

ProLine PPL-30001

Purolator Premium Plus L30001

Purolator Premium Plus L390001

Purolator Pure One PL30001

Quaker State Q58A

STP S-01

Wix 51515

I hope to add more brands to this study as I can acquire them. The analysis is sorted by brand name in alphabetical order. In each brand section, I have broken the information down into the brand name models, sorted by price. Pictures coming soon!

Disassembly and Measurements

Basically, I cut open each filter on a lathe and took measurements of many of their attributes. Simply cutting them open revealed some very interesting (and disturbing) information.

The sections below detail each of the filters I tested. A summary of the measurements I took can be found in a table for each. I noticed that other filter part numbers for the same brand were designed a bit differently. This is probably because of the shape of the can and the requirements for that engine. Here is a description of each table entry:

Average Retail Price	The average of all the retail prices I found for this filter (to the nearest $0.50)
Cartridge Length	The length of the filter cartridge, including end caps
Cartridge Outside Diameter	The outside diameter of the filter cartridge element pleats
Cartridge Inside Diameter	The inside diameter of the filter cartridge inside support tube
Cartridge Pleats	The number of pleats (or folds) in the element while in the cartridge
Cartridge End Cap Type	The type of material used to construct the end caps
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	The valve design and construction material
Bypass Valve Type	The valve design and construction material
Element Type	The type of material used to construct the filter element and the seam seal
Element Length	The overall length of the element when removed from the cartridge and stretched out
Element Width	The width of the stretched-out element
Element Surface Area	The calculated surface area of the cartridge using the above two values
Shell Thickness	The thickness of the metal used to construct the filter's shell
Backplate Thickness	The thickness of the metal used to construct the filter's backplate
Gasket Type	The type of material used to construct the backplate sealing gasket (O-ring)
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	The amount of pressure that the filter case can withstand for a short duration without failure.
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	See the SAE Tests section for more details on this test.
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	See the SAE Tests section for more details on this test.

The construction of the anti-drainback and bypass valves is an important feature. Many are made of nitrile rubber. As long as they have good sealing surfaces, they generally work fine. However, nitrile rubber gets stiff in extreme cold and will likely fail to seal in those conditions. Silicone rubber seals or steel valves are not prone to this. Many bypass valves are spring-loaded steel and work well. Some are spring-loaded plastic and are often not molded well enough to make a decent seal, allowing oil to leak past them.

Probably the most important value here is the element surface area. This determines the amount of filter media that is available to trap particles. The smaller the area, the sooner the filter will become plugged and will end up bypassing much of the oil instead of filtering it. More pleats in the element does not necessarily mean more surface area (as you will soon see). In fact, too many pleats can end up restricting the flow too much because there is not enough space between them to allow oil to flow.

The shell and backplate thickness are only relevant if your engine’s oil system operates at unusually high pressures. Even the cheapest filters have to be strong enough for stock oiling systems, or they will not pass SAE tests.

The SAE filtration efficiency tests are from the manufactures, and are only available for the filters I could find the information for.

Other measurements and values are debatable and I will allow you to draw your own conclusions from them.

SAE Tests

All filters have to pass SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) tests to prove that they can truly filter out small enough particles. There are two tests available for automobile engine oil filters. All filters must pass the J806 test, but the new J1858 is much more meaningful. Currently the J1858 test is optional. Really, it's a way for high-end filter manufacturers to show off their great filters.

The SAE J806 test uses a single-pass test, checking for contaminant holding capacity, size of contaminant particles trapped, and ability to maintain clean oil. As an amendment of the J806 test, the multi-pass test also looks for filter life in hours, contaminant capacity in grams, and efficiency based on weight. The efficiency of the filter is determined only by weight through gravimetric measurement of the filtered test liquid. Typical numbers for paper filter elements are 85% (single pass) and 80% (multi-pass).

The SAE J1858 test provides both particle counting and gravimetric measurement to measure filter capacity and efficiency. Actual counts of contaminant particles by size are obtained every 10 minutes, both upstream (before the filter) and downstream (after the filter), for evaluation. From this data filtration ratio and efficiency for each contaminant particle size can be determined as well as dust capacity and pressure loss as a function of time. Typical numbers for paper element filters are 40% at 10 microns, 60% at 20 microns, 93% at 30 microns, and 97% at 40 microns.

AC Delco

Duraguard PF2

Some years ago, a study was done on oil filters that uncovered the Fram filter farce. They named AC Delco’s filter to be one of the better models. Later, AC Delco changed their design and went to a cheaper setup made by an offshore manufacturer. Even so, I definitely recommend this filter over the design of any Fram filter. In fact, I even recommend it over the low-end Wix and I (personally) prefer it over the Purolators.

The filter cartridge has a large outside diameter with deep pleats, which gives the filter element the maximum flow possible. At first glance, it appears to have little filter element media, but the surface area measure was suprising: 315 sqin. The unit had a solid top end cap because the bypass valve is at the bottom, which is a well-constructed spring-loaded steel with a nitrile seal design. The nitrile rubber diaphram-type anti-drainback valve doubles as the seal between the bypass valve and the cartridge. The only drawback to this design is that the bypass valve seats metal-to-metal against the backplate. This could allow oil from the clean side of the filter to seep back into the oil pan, but it won't allow the dirty oil in the filter to seep back. Oil that is in the main gallery usually leaks out through the main bearings anyway while the engine sits. This is a better alternative to the high-end Wix, which can allow oil to seep from the dirty side of the filter to the clean side.

The telltale signs for an AC Delco filter are: 5 large holes for the oil inlet and 6 spot welds on the rim surrounding them. There are no crimps holding the gasket in place. When you look through the inlet holes, you can see the metal bypass valve with its 12 small holes and the black anti-drainback valve diaphram around it. Through the center outlet hole, you can see the spring for the bypass valve.

Exploded view:

Average Retail Price	$3
Cartridge Length	4.625 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.375 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.375 inches
Cartridge Pleats	36
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped steel
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel
Element Type	Paper media, glued seam
Element Length	70.0 inches
Element Width	4.500 inches
Element Surface Area	315 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.015 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.100 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

AMSOIL

SDF15

This filter has been acquired and is awaiting disassembly.

Car And Driver

SF-1A

This filter is a Champion filter with the one-piece filter cartridge and the fragile paper filter element.

Average Retail Price	$3
Cartridge Length	4.000 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	54
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, glued seam
Element Length	87 inches
Element Width	3.875 inches
Element Surface Area	337 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.012 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.102 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Champ

This filter is manufactured by Champion Laboratories, Inc. (same guys who make the spark plugs), and is sold under several other brand names. Champion admits some of these outright, and they are: Lee, Lee Maxi, and STP. Though they claim the Lee Maxi is a higher quality filter, they make no claims as to why. It sounds more like a marketing scheme to me.

The Champion design has metal end caps on the filter cartridge, with the bypass valve stamped right into the bottom end cap like the Purolator. I refer to this as a one-piece filter cartridge.

Though definitely not the same design as the Purolator, it does use the same type of leaf-spring-type spacer at the top of the cartridge and the nitrile anti-drainback valve, which doubles as the cartridge-to-backplate seal, at the bottom. The drawback to this one-piece cartridge is the rather fragile filter element paper media. It is a thin, brittle paper that rips fairly easily. It was difficult to disassemble these cartridges without destroying the filter element. One other issue is that I sometimes noticed some rust on the backplate of these filters. Since the rust is usually around by the inlet holes, any loose rust would be caught by the filter.

The telltale signs for a Champion filter are: 6 large holes for the oil inlet, one of which is larger than the others. Only the black anti-drainback valve can be seen through the inlet holes. There are 6 large crimps holding the gasket in place. Through the center outlet hole, you can see the bypass valve spring. Usually, the backplate metal is dull, or even rusty.

Deutsch

D539

This filter is a Champion filter with the one-piece filter cartridge and the fragile paper filter element.

Average Retail Price	$3
Cartridge Length	4.000 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	55
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, glued seam
Element Length	88.5 inches
Element Width	3.875 inches
Element Surface Area	343 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.012 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.102 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

D545

This filter has not yet been acquired, but is apparently a heavy-duty version of the D539 (Champion).

Fram

Years ago Fram was a quality filter manufacturer. Now their standard filter (the radioactive-orange cans) is one of the worst out there. These filters are manufactured by Allied Signal, Inc. Please do not buy these filters. By boycotting it, we may be able to cause some change. I have personally had one if these filters fail and actually cause engine damage due to bits of paper and glue floating around in the engine.

For some inside dirt on Fram filters, see this email from an Allied Signal production engineer.

Fram Extra Guard PH8A

This filter cartridge has a small outside diameter with a rather low filter element surface area (193 sqin), and features cardboard end caps that are glued in place. The rubber anti-drainback valve seals against the cardboard and easily leaks, causing dirty oil to drain back into the pan. If you have a noisy valve train at startup, this filter is likely the cause. The bypass valves are plastic and are sometimes not molded correctly, which allows them to leak all the time, but they often leak anyway. The backplate has smaller and fewer oil inlet holes, which may restrict flow, and is made of thin material.

The telltale signs for a Fram Extra Guard are: It has 8 small holes for the oil inlet and a thin, cheap-looking backplate, and is currently stamped with a “2Y”. There are 5 very small crimps holding the gasket in place. If you look into the center hole all the way to the top of the filter, you will see a kind of “button” in the end cap of the cartridge (which looks like it's made of metal from there). This is the plastic bypass valve.

Exploded view:

Average Retail Price	$3
Cartridge Length	4.125 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.000 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.375 inches
Cartridge Pleats	34
Cartridge End Cap Type	Cardboard
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded plastic
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	47.5 inches
Element Width	4.063 inches
Element Surface Area	193 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.015 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.089 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Fram Tough Guard TG8A

Even with all the problems of the other Fram filters, this one is not too bad. Aside from the filter cartridge, it is a very good design. Too bad Fram can’t get passed the cardboard end caps.

It has an improved filter element with more surface area (248 sqin), a heavy silicone anti-drainback valve with a good sealing surface, the same plastic pressure relief valve but with an integral screen to keep out large particles, and enough inlet holes for good flow. The only real drawback to this filter is that it is capped on each end with cardboard instead of metal.

The telltale signs for a Fram Tough Guard filter are: It has a better backplate that is usually shiny, with six larger holes for the inlet and 6 spot welds around the them. There are 6 large crimps holding the gasket in place. When you look through the inlet holes, you can see the orange anti-drainback valve. If you look into the center hole all the way to the top of the filter, you will see a kind of “button” in the end cap of the cartridge (which looks like it's made of metal from there). This is the plastic bypass valve.

Average Retail Price	$5
Cartridge Length	4.125 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.000 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	50
Cartridge End Cap Type	Cardboard
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Silicone rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded plastic with integral screen
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	61.0 inches
Element Width	4.063 inches
Element Surface Area	248 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.015 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.187 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber, PTFE-treated
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Far Left: extra guard cartridge. Left: Double Guard. Right: Tough Guard

Fram Double Guard DG8A

This is a frustrating filter. Please do not buy it. It is one of the most expensive filters you can buy and it is junk. Inside is a basic Fram Extra Guard (PH8A) filter element that has larger diameter

holes at the end and has been pre-oiled. You can see this in the picture above (far left). I assume this is to hold the Teflon particles in the filter element before the unit is installed. Don’t put Teflon in your engine. It does not belong there! DuPont does not recommend using their Teflon product in internal combustion engines.

Although it has the worst filter element possible (193 sqin), it does have a clever spring-loaded nitrile rubber anti-drainback valve and bypass valve combination. Too bad the rest of the filter is worthless. Please don’t buy this filter!

The telltale signs for a Fram Tough Guard filter are: It has a better backplate that is usually shiny, with six larger holes for the inlet and 6 spot welds around the them. The backplate should be

stamped with a “1K”. There are 6 large crimps holding the gasket in place. The anti-drainback valve diaphram behind the inlet holes is black. If you look into the center hole all the way to the top

of the filter, you will not see the “button” in the end cap of the cartridge (which looks like it’s made of metal from there).

Average Retail Price	$10
Cartridge Length	4.125 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.000 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	38
Cartridge End Cap Type	Cardboard
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Nitrile rubber, integral
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	47.5 inches
Element Width	4.063 inches
Element Surface Area	193 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.015 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.187 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Hard Driver

HD01

This filter has been acquired and is awaiting full disassembly.

Average Retail Price	$8.50 + $4 shipping
Cartridge Length	? inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	? inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	? inches
Cartridge Pleats	?
Cartridge End Cap Type	?
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	?
Bypass Valve Type	?
Element Type	Synthetic media
Element Length	? inches
Element Width	? inches
Element Surface Area	? square inches
Shell Thickness	? inches
Backplate Thickness	? inches
Gasket Type	?
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	200 psi
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	95% at 10 microns 98% at 20 microns 98% at 30 microns 98% at 40 microns

Mobil 1

M1-301

Like the Champion, this filter is made by Champion Industries. However, it uses a unique end plate and a thicker can that make it the strongest filter available for wide-distribution retail sale. It also does not use the fragile paper media of the Champion filter. I’m happy to say that this filter is NOT a fake. It is definitely a unique design.

It uses a synthetic fiber element that can filter out very small particles and is much stronger than the fragile, Champion paper media. It is rated just under the Purolator Pure One as far as filtering capability, but is still very much above conventional paper filters. It also has a very strong construction to withstand high-pressure spikes during start-up. Given the choice between the Purolator Pure One and the Mobil 1 filters, I would choose the Mobil 1 because of the restriction concerns of the Pure One and that pesky assembly string. However, as with all Mobil 1 products, expect to pay 2 - 3 times as much for this filter.

Exploded view:

Average Retail Price	$10
Cartridge Length	4.250 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	52
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Synthetic media, glued seam
Element Length	85 inches
Element Width	4.125 inches
Element Surface Area	351 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.022 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.138 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	600 psi
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Single pass: 98% Multiple pass: 95%
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Mopar

This section features a special look at other oil filter alternatives for the 2.2L and 2.5L engines, listed by Mopar part number. Keep in mind that these filters are designed for different engines and have different dimensions. So, it's not fair to compare them with the other filters on this page. The of the matter is, these filters are made by the other manufacturers on this page. My mission was to uncover who is who. What I found is that Mopar uses several different manufacturers.

If you cannot use the Ford 5.0L filter because of clearance problems, try using one of the alternatives listed here. I have included the outside dimensions so you can see if it will work for you, and they are listed below in order of increasing size. If you find a filter that will fit, you can use that type of vehicle and engine to look up that filter design for other manufacturers (or the same manufacturer, but a different brand).

The chart below shows the part numbers shown here, as well as the engine it belongs to. You can use that information to look up these filters for other brands. I have supplied only the number for those with multiple varieties. Just add the prefix for the model you want. For example, the Purolator 10241 number is the L10241 for the Premium Plus, PL10241 for the Pure One, etc.

Mopar Oil Filter Conversion Table

Mopar P/N	Engine Types	Example car to look up	Delco	Fram	Purolator	Wix
4105409	2.0L, 2.2L, 2.4L, 2.5L	Dodge Lancer	PF53	3614	10241	?
5281090	2.2L, 2.5L, 3.3L, 3.8L, 3.9L, 5.2L, 5.9L	Dodge Stratus or Intrepid	PF13	16	14670	?
3549957	318cc, 383cc, 400cc, 440cc, etc	Dodge Dart or Challenger	PF20	43	20081	?
53020311	8.0L V10	Dodge Ram (severe duty)	PF2136	7226	34875	?

4105409

This is the stock 2.2L and 2.5L oil filter through about 1990, from the dealership. I have this information here so that you can see why you should not be using this stock-sized filter anymore.

This one is made by Champion Industries. With a tiny surface area of only 124 sqin it has less than 35% of the surface area of the STP S-01 version (360 sqin), which is also a Champion. Once that small filtration area has been plugged, the oil is directed through the bypass valve and the filter is useless.

Average Retail Price	$6.50
Overall Filter Length	? inches
Overall Filter Diameter	? inches
Cartridge Length	2.375 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	2.675 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.675 inches
Cartridge Pleats	56
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	55 inches
Element Width	2.250 inches
Element Surface Area	124 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.010 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.115 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

5281090

This filter is also a stock 2.2L and 2.5L, but for 1991 and later engines, though it fits them all. It is from the dealership and is made by Purolator. It is an upgrade from the stock filter, with about

48% more filtration area. If you have clearance problems with the Ford 5.0L filter because of your alternator, you can try this model. Use the Overall Filter Length and Diameter to see if it will fit.

Average Retail Price	$6.50
Overall Filter Length	? inches
Overall Filter Diameter	? inches
Cartridge Length	2.675 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	62
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	96.0 inches
Element Width	2.500 inches
Element Surface Area	240 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.010 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.115 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

3549957

I purchased this filter from two places, to prove a point. The point is that Mopar filters are like a box of chocolates; you never know what you are going to get. In fact, this seems to be true of many OEM and some fake brand filters. I purchased one filter from my local dealer and the other from a nearby store that stocks some Mopar parts (Murray's Auto Parts). Though the Mopar part numbers are the same, the filters are completely different. You can identify the manufacturer of a particular filter by looking at the backplate. See the AC Delco, Champion, Fram, Purolator, and Wix sections for the details on what to look for.

The filter from Murray’s Auto Parts has probably been sitting on the shelf for a little while, so I imagine that it is an older version, but it was not dated. This filter is made by Champion Industries. It features the one-piece filter cartridge with the fragile filter element, and some rust on the back plate.

Average Retail Price	$6.50
Overall Filter Length	? inches
Overall Filter Diameter	? inches
Cartridge Length	3.000 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	56
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, glued seam
Element Length	90.0 inches
Element Width	3.000 inches
Element Surface Area	270 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.012 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.102 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

The filter from my local Dodge dealership was dated 02/98. This filter is a Purolator. While the surface area of the filter element is about the same as the Champion version, the Purolator element paper media is much stronger than the Dana paper media. However there is the issue with the assembly string on this version. It’s a catch 22.

Average Retail Price	$6.50
Overall Filter Length	? inches
Overall Filter Diameter	? inches
Cartridge Length	3.125 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	61
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	95.0 inches
Element Width	2.875 inches
Element Surface Area	273 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.010 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.115 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

53020311

This filter was interesting, but unfortunately only in bad ways. I also found this filter at Murray’s Auto Parts, but left it there when I looked at the backplate. I decided to get one from the dealership instead, but it was exactly the same. Cutting it open confirmed it: this filter is a Fram Extra Guard (the radioactive orange one). It’s definitely the cheapest Fram design with the infamous anti-drainback valve sealing against the cardboard cartridge end caps, and the plastic bypass valve. It’s always easy to identify a Fram Extra Guard by the cheap-looking, thin backplate with many small holes for the oil inlet. How Chrysler can call this cheap filter a “Severe Duty” filter is beyond me, but it is stamped right on the can. Even Fram makes better filters than this (Tough Guard), but they probably cost too close to the Mopar $6.50 oil filter price for a decent price mark-up. Fram does not list a part number for this filter in the Tough Guard version.

If you really must have this filter, consider looking to another brand, such as Purolator or Wix. Just look up a Dodge Viper or Ram Truck with a 8.0L V10, or use the Mopar Conversion Table above. The problem is that the Purolator is suspiciously like the Fram, however I know it is not a Fram because of the way it was constructed (assembly string, etc). Like the Frams, it has cardboard end caps and a few of the pleats were not glued down. My advice is to avoid all of these filters and go with the Ford 5.0L filters.

Since this filter is popular is Mopar circles, I bought each of these and measured them as well. I was unable to find the AC Delco version anywhere. As you can see, this Fram does have more surface area than the PH8A version, but it is still less than an AC Delco, Purolator, or Wix Ford 5.0L filter. So if you think you are getting a bigger filter with one of these, think again.

Mopar Severe Use 53020311 and Fram PH7226

Average Retail Price	Mopar: $6.50, Fram: $9.00
Overall Filter Length	? inches
Overall Filter Diameter	? inches
Cartridge Length	4.250 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.200 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	49
Cartridge End Cap Type	Cardboard
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded plastic
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	73.5 inches
Element Width	4.125 inches
Element Surface Area	301 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.014 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.110 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Purolator Premium Plus L34875

Average Retail Price	$7.00
Overall Filter Length	? inches
Overall Filter Diameter	? inches
Cartridge Length	4.100 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.200 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	50
Cartridge End Cap Type	Cardboard
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphram
Bypass Valve Type	Nitril rubber diaphram (same piece)
Element Type	Paper media, glued seam
Element Length	76.0 inches
Element Width	4.000 inches
Element Surface Area	304 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.015 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.140 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Motorcraft

Long Lasting FL-1A

This is an interesting filter. Basically, it is a Purolator Pure One filter cartridge in a Purolator Premium Plus case. Don’t be fooled by the differently-shaped holes cut into the oil inlet. This is the only difference. This is a good filter design and if you want to get a Purolator Pure One filter, get this one instead: it is cheaper.

Like the Purolator Pure One, this filter cartridge features a very large element surface area (400 sqin), but with many pleats (64). This packs the filter together rather tightly and may restrict flow somewhat. I could identify the Pure One element media by a purple dye they use at the seam. It also has the mysterious assembly string wrapped around the outside of the element. Like the Purolators, it features a spring-loaded metal bypass valve and a nitrile rubber diaphram-type anti-drainback valve. The bypass valve is stamped right into the bottom end cap of the cartridge, so it is all one piece.

This data is taken from the Purolator specs and are not from Motorcraft:

Average Retail Price	$3
Cartridge Length	4.125 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	64
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	100.0 inches
Element Width	4.000 inches
Element Surface Area	400 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.011 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.120 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Single pass: 99.7% Multiple pass: 96%
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

NAPA

1515 Gold

This filter is a Wix filter with the two-piece filter cartridge. As with the Wix filter, the metal bypass valve seats on the metal cartridge end cap with no gasket of any kind. Some small amount of oil probably leaks through there. It also has the tougher paper filter media of the Wix.

Average Retail Price	$5
Cartridge Length	4.000 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	59
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, glued seam
Element Length	87 inches
Element Width	3.875 inches
Element Surface Area	337 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.014 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.104 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

51515 Silver

This filter is a champion filter with the one-piece filter cartridge. As with the other Champion filters, it has the fragile paper media for a filter element. This is based off of my observation of the filter’s case. I did not purchase this filter to tear down, but may do so in the future.

Penzoil

PZ-1

This filter was a big disappointment, but I knew what I was in for the moment I took it out of the box. It is a Fram Extra Guard (PH8A) in every way, shape, and form. The only difference is the yellow paint and Penzoil logo. As with the Fram, please do not buy this filter. Penzoil is insulting their own name by putting it on this filter, but obviously they are not interested in selling a quality unit.

All the measurements were exactly the same as the Fram Extra Guard PH8A.

Average Retail Price	$2
Cartridge Length	4.125 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.000 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.375 inches
Cartridge Pleats	34
Cartridge End Cap Type	Cardboard
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded plastic
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	47.5 inches
Element Width	4.063 inches
Element Surface Area	193 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.015 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.089 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

PowerFlo

SL30001

As you may suspect by the part number, this filter is a Purolator Premium Plus. There were no manufacturing differences, but the cost was an average of $2 instead of $3.

ProLine

PPL-30001

Yet another Purolator Premium Plus. All measurements were the same. The cost was $2. One thing I noticed with this particular example was that the mysterious assembly string was tied too tight and had damaged the filter element. Although only this one had the problem, I am suspicious of this filter design as a whole (including all of the Purolators).

<- With String - String Removed ->

As you may be able to tell, the string did not rip into the filter element, it only crushed it. There was no evidence that the element had been compromised. Out of the 8 Purolators (and clones) tested, this was the only one with a problem.

Purolator

Premium Plus L30001

Left to Right: Motorcraft, Purolator Pure One, Purolator Premium Plus

Here is a fairly well designed filter, especially for the price. One odd thing about Purolator’s filters is a string that is always wrapped around the filter element. I assume that this is there to hold the element in place while the glue in the end caps cures. Of all the Purolator-based filter I tested, there was one (the ProLine) that had filter element damage from this string. Although it was one of five tested, I am weary of this design. Even though the element was crushed a bit, it was not ripped. I will take apart a used one at my next oil change.

The filter cartridge has an impressive surface area of 316 sqin, which is very close to the AC Delco Duraguard. The difference is that Purolator's filter element is compressed into more pleats (51) than the AC Delco. This may restrict flow somewhat, but not as much in this model than the Pure One. It features a spring-loaded metal bypass valve and a nitrile rubber diaphram-type anti-drainback valve, which doubles as the seal between the backplate and the cartridge. Like the Champion, this bypass valve is stamped right into the bottom end cap of the cartridge, so it is all one piece.

The telltale sign for a Purolator filter are: 8 medium-sized holes for the oil inlet and nothing but a black (or orange for the Pure One) diaphram to be seen through them. There are 6 large crimps holding the gasket in place. Through the center outlet hole, you can see the spring for the bypass valve.

Exploded view:

Average Retail Price	$3
Cartridge Length	4.125 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	51
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	79.0 inches
Element Width	4.000 inches
Element Surface Area	316 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.011 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.115 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Pure One PL30001

This filter has a few improvements over the Premium Plus. It has a denser filter media to filter out smaller particles and more surface area to make up for the flow restriction. Aside from those the cartridge is the same construction as the Premium Plus.

The filter cartridge has an even more impressive surface area of 400 sqin. The potential issue is that this filter element is compressed into even more pleats (64) than the Premium Plus. This may restrict flow more than it helps relieve it. It also features a spring-loaded metal bypass valve and a silicone rubber diaphram-type anti-drainback valve, which doubles as the seal between the backplate and the cartridge. The bypass valve is located at the base of the cartridge, not at the top.

Average Retail Price	$5
Cartridge Length	4.125 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	64
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Silicone rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel
Element Type	Paper media, stamped metal seam
Element Length	100.0 inches
Element Width	4.000 inches
Element Surface Area	400 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.011 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.115 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber, PTFE-treated
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Single pass: 99.7% Multiple pass: 96%
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Quaker State

QS8A

Yet another Purolator Premium Plus. Who are these people fooling? Cost was a bit over $2. If you like Purolators and you like the color green, buy this filter.

STP

S-01

This filter is the Champion Industries filter with the one-piece filter cartridge and the fragile paper element.

Average Retail Price	$3
Cartridge Length	4.000 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	58
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel, with bypass valve
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, glued seam
Element Length	93 inches
Element Width	3.875 inches
Element Surface Area	360 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.012 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.102 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Wix

These filters are manufactured by the Dana corporation, who also manufactures all of the Wix clones. These include NAPA and many OEM filters.

NOTE: This section of the page was incorrect in regards to the “low-end” and “high-end” Wix concept. What I thought was a “low-end” Wix is actually manufactured by Champion Industries. My thanks to those who pointed this out to me. If you see any remaining references to low-end and high-end Wix filters, let me know. Hopefully I found them all.

This filter has metal cartridge end caps, but has a separate bypass valve that rests against the bottom end cap, like the AC Delco. I refer to this as a two-piece filter cartridge. Like the Champion, it uses an anti-drainback valve that doubles as the bypass valve-to-backplate seal. Instead of the leaf-spring-type spacer that most filters use, these use a stiff coil spring at the top of the cartridge. Like the Purolator, the filter element paper media is stronger than the Champion media. The only drawback to this design is that the bypass valve seats metal-to-metal against the bottom cartridge end plate. This could allow dirty oil to seep from the dirty side to the clean side of the filter, bypassing the element. The design will not allow oil to seep back into the pan, though.

The telltale signs for a Wix are: 6 large holes for the oil inlet with only the black anti-drainback valve to be seen through them. There are 6 “notches” that hold the gasket in place. Through the center outlet hole, you can see the bypass valve spring. Usually the backplate metal is shiny.

51515

This filter features a good surface area, but a lot of shallower pleats. This makes it similar to the Purolator’s pleats.

Average Retail Price	$5
Cartridge Length	4.000 inches
Cartridge Outside Diameter	3.250 inches
Cartridge Inside Diameter	1.625 inches
Cartridge Pleats	61
Cartridge End Cap Type	Stamped-steel
Anti-Drainback Valve Type	Nitrile rubber diaphragm
Bypass Valve Type	Spring-loaded steel, nitrile seal
Element Type	Paper media, glued seam
Element Length	90 inches
Element Width	3.875 inches
Element Surface Area	349 square inches
Shell Thickness	0.014 inches
Backplate Thickness	0.104 inches
Gasket Type	Nitrile rubber
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure	Unknown
SAE J806 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown
SAE J1858 Filtration Efficiency	Unknown

Conclusions

All of this information can be a bit overwhelming. When it comes down to it, all of the lower-priced filters ($5 or below) have they ups and downs. In reality, there are only five different manufacturers available. Here are the low-cost filters that I feel safe using, based on all this information (in alphabetical order): AC Delco, Purolator, and Wix. Here are my reasons for each:

I like the deep pleats of the AC Delco’s filter element and the fact that it is not weak like the Champion. I also like the way that the anti-drainback valve diaphram makes a positive seal to the filter cartridge and to the bypass valve, which sort of “snaps” into the diaphram. The fact that the bypass valve seats against the backplate metal-to-metal is not a big deal. It probably doesn’t leak anyway, but if it does, only clean oil can get back into the pan. In case you haven’t noticed, I like this filter. :-) It is the best filter that you can buy for $3.

The Purolator is a very solid design. It seems to have the toughest paper filter element of them all and the bypass valve is built right into the cartridge. There are no internal sealing problems with this filter at all. I wish the inner diameter of the cartridge was smaller so that the pleats could be fewer and deeper. The Premium Plus version looks like it flows fine, but the Pure One or Motorcraft versions seem to be packed a bit too tightly. That assembly string still bothers me somewhat, but not enough to avoid these well-made filters completely. My ‘88 Shadow ES (as of 2/24/99) has a Purolator Premium Plus in it right now. I plan to cut it open and see how it holds up at the next oil change.

I don’t care for the Champion filters. The filter elements are way too fragile to give me much confidence in them. That, along with the rusty backplates, makes me shy away from them. Some decent filter material and a little oil used during assembly would make this into a fine filter. Like the Purolator, I like how the bypass valve is built right into the filter cartridge. This filter has no internal sealing problems, either. Even so, I won’t be using them.

The Wix filter is a very well made filter. My praise goes to Dana for putting some effort into it. Aside from being a stronger case, it also uses a much better filter element (about the same as the AC Delco). Like the AC Delco, it also has a minor internal sealing problem. In this case, the bypass valve has a metal-to-metal seal to the filter cartridge. It probably doesn’t really leak either, but if it did, dirty oil could get to the clean side of the filter. Otherwise it is a good filter. Given the choice between the Wix and the AC Delco at the same cost, I'd pick one while blind-folded. However, the Wix is about twice the price, so...

If money is no object, I would go with the Mobil 1. Although it has Champion internals, it has a really tough synthetic fiber filter element, which is the Champion’s only major downfall. The element is stronger and thicker than the Purolator, but they claim that it flows just as good as paper. As with the other low-end Wix filters, it has no internal sealing problems. The $10 price tag is a bit steep, but it is the best filter you can buy retail. Watch for “Mobil 1 Oil Change” sales, which includes 5 quarts of Mobil 1 synthetic oil and a Mobil 1 filter. Granted, there are probably better filters available through mail order, but I haven't tested those yet...

I reserve the right to change my opinion at any time. It could easily change if another filter (or one of the filters I am waiting on) comes around and is better.

It should be clear that Mopar filters are really nothing special. Unless you are trying to have a perfect restoration and need that Mopar logo, there is no reason why you should be buying Mopar oil filters. Most of them seem to currently be Purolators or Champions, but that could change at any time.

See the AC Delco, Champion, Fram, Purolator, and Wix sections for information on how to identify these manufacturers by looking at the backplate. The tell-tale signs are always there.

This page is maintained by XXXXXXXXXXX and was last updated 05/25/99. Comments? Questions? Email XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX